Posts Archive

Technical and litigation notes

Clear
AI Governance & Regulation

Ontology as Power — Who Defines Behavioral Reality?

22 May 2026 / EU, India, US

A behavioral ontology decides what concepts exist, how they are defined, and which cultures they assume. The team that writes the ontology defines the system's model of human behaviour. That is a political act as much as a technical one.

AI Governance & Regulation

Governing AI Safe Language — Who Writes the Rules?

22 May 2026 / EU, India, US

The governance wrapper translates harmful labels into safe phrases. But who decides which phrases are safe? This post examines the governance deficit in safe-language design.

Data Privacy & GDPR

Event Buses and Data Minimisation

22 May 2026 / EU, India, US

A behavioral event bus logs every signal emitted between engines. Those signals are personal data. This post examines the conflict between event logging for audit and GDPR data minimisation.

AI Governance & Regulation

Explainability as Legal Evidence

22 May 2026 / EU, India, US

An explainability trace generated at scoring time can be produced in discovery. This post examines chain-of-custody requirements, forensic soundness standards, and the gap between technical explainability and legal admissibility.

AI Governance & Regulation

Confidence Scores and the Illusion of Precision

22 May 2026 / EU, India, US

A confidence score presented without its uncertainty band and reducer list becomes a claim of certainty. This post explores the liability of precision theatre in AI outputs.

AI Governance & Regulation

The Control Plane as a Governance Chokepoint

22 May 2026 / EU, India, US

The control plane knows everything: which engines ran, in what order, and with what outputs. That makes it the ideal — and perhaps the mandatory — place to enforce jurisdiction-specific AI regulation.

AI Governance & Regulation

Engine Registries and the Right to Know

22 May 2026 / EU, Global

Should individuals have the right to know which AI engines scored them? GDPR Article 22 provides a partial answer. This post makes the case for mandatory engine-level disclosure.

AI Governance & Regulation

Who Is Accountable When a Behavioral AI System Labels Someone?

22 May 2026 / EU, India, US

When an AI system with 34 engines labels a person, the accountability chain breaks across engineers, vendors, and decision-makers. This post maps the gaps and proposes mandatory engine accountability registration.

Request a consultation

This is a lightweight intake endpoint for now. It is structured so the practice management system can later take over scheduling, conflict checks and matter creation.

Submitting this form does not create an advocate-client relationship. Please avoid sending confidential details until engagement is confirmed.