Posts Archive

Technical and litigation notes

Clear
Data Privacy & GDPR

Audio Data Security — Voice Notes in Transit and at Rest

22 May 2026 / EU, India

the WhatsApp AI agent downloads voice notes from Meta's media API, stores them as temp files on the Raspberry Pi, transcribes them with Whisper, and then links the transcript to workspace records. At each step, the voice data is both sensitive (potentially privileged legal communications) and at risk.

Security & Compliance

SSH Key Management in Production Systems

22 May 2026 / EU, India

The www-data SSH key used by the webhook server to call AI services is a production credential. Compromise of that key means an attacker can call your AI services, potentially exfiltrate conversation data, or use your resources for unintended purposes.

Security & Compliance

Securing an Exposed Webhook Server

22 May 2026 / EU, India

A webhook endpoint that receives WhatsApp messages from Meta is exposed to the public internet. HMAC signature verification proves the payload came from Meta, but it does not protect against replay attacks, rate-based amplification, or attackers who obtain the app secret.

Data Privacy & GDPR

Self-Hosted AI and Data Sovereignty

22 May 2026 / EU, India

Running Ollama, Whisper, and Kokoro on premises means conversation data never leaves your infrastructure. For a legal practice handling privileged communications, this is a meaningful data protection advantage. But self-hosting is not a compliance certificate.

Legal Tech & Professional Ethics

Relay Agents and Lawyer Supervision

22 May 2026 / EU, India, US, UK

the WhatsApp AI agent's relay pattern routes client questions to lawyers. But "routing a question" and "professional supervision of AI" are not the same thing. Model Rule 5.3 requires lawyers to ensure that non-lawyer assistance is conducted compatibly with their professional obligations — including when the non-lawyer is an AI.

AI Governance & Regulation

Intent Classification and the Duty to Act

22 May 2026 / EU, India, US, UK

Intent classification in a legal AI agent is not merely a routing mechanism. When an intent with safety implications is correctly classified — a client expressing fear, distress, or danger — the question of what the system must do next is a legal and ethical question, not just a design question.

Security & Compliance

WhatsApp as a Legal Communication Channel

22 May 2026 / EU, India, US, UK

WhatsApp messages are now routinely produced in litigation as evidence. The WhatsApp Business API version — which routes messages through Meta's servers — has different evidentiary and preservation characteristics than personal WhatsApp. Law firms using the WhatsApp AI agent need to understand both.

AI Governance & Regulation

AI Agents Sending Audio — Disclosure and Impersonation

22 May 2026 / EU, India, US, UK

the WhatsApp AI agent sends voice note responses generated by Kokoro TTS. If that voice sounds like a human lawyer, recipients may believe they are hearing the lawyer's actual voice. This creates impersonation risk — with potential professional conduct, fraud, and consumer protection implications.

Data Privacy & GDPR

Recording and Transcribing WhatsApp Conversations

22 May 2026 / EU, India, US, UK

Every WhatsApp voice note processed by the WhatsApp AI agent is transcribed, stored as text, and used to create workspace records. Each of these steps processes personal data. GDPR requires a lawful basis. The most appropriate basis — consent — requires that users know their voice notes will be transcribed before they send them.

Request a consultation

This is a lightweight intake endpoint for now. It is structured so the practice management system can later take over scheduling, conflict checks and matter creation.

Submitting this form does not create an advocate-client relationship. Please avoid sending confidential details until engagement is confirmed.